|
APOSTLES OF ATHEISM
How
the broadcast and print media helped spread the
Gospel of Godlessness in 2007
Full Report
Executive Summary|
Pdf Version
Introduction
Atheism Ascendant?
Newsweek and ABC Lead the Way
Counterpoints to Christianity
Only
Atheism: A Question for
Republicans Only
Exquisite Sensitivity
Shown to Atheists
Conclusion and Recommendation
Introduction
Like
clockwork, the holiest Christian holidays bring stories into the news cycle that
clearly take aim at the faith of the majority of Americans. In 2007, the
Discovery Channel’s “The Jesus Tomb” made headlines just before Easter. So it
comes as no surprise to learn that a popular comedian announced plans to release
a “documentary on atheism” on Easter Sunday, 2008.
Atheism has always
intrigued the news media.
A 2005 study by the Media Research Center
on the
media’s coverage of religion showed that church-state issues and the convergence
of religion and politics was the third most heavily reported religion topic of
the year, behind the Catholic Church and Islam. In 2007 the coverage of atheism
changed and grew beyond the political.
Fully 87 percent of
Americans say they believe in God, according to the National Cultural Values
Survey. Yet atheism was the “it” belief system in 2007, or so it seemed
according to publishers’ bestseller lists and the coverage the topic received
from the national media last year. According to “State of the News Media,” a
report by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, 91 percent of journalists
working for national news organizations say it is not necessary to believe in
God to be moral. This is exactly the point espoused by 2007’s best selling
books on atheism: God is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens, The God
Delusion by Richard Dawkins and Letter to a Christian Nation by Sam
Harris.
The frequent mentions of atheism and
large numbers of features on atheists in news magazines and broadcast news
programs caught the attention of the Media Research Center’s Culture and Media
Institute. CMI set out to determine just how atheism was being covered by the
media. Was atheism being scrutinized like Christianity, or treated with kid
gloves? Were atheists challenged on their beliefs as other religious believers
– especially Christians – were?
CMI examined the 2007
coverage of atheism by several national news outlets, including all news
programs on the three broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, NBC), every 2007 issue of
three leading weekly news magazines (Newsweek, Time and U.S. News and
World Report), and four news programs aired on taxpayer-funded National
Public Radio (All Things Considered, Morning Edition, Weekend Edition and
Talk of the Nation). This report found and examined 105 stories that
either featured atheism or mentioned atheism in the context of reporting on
culture, religion and politics.
The analysis found that
the media did not scrutinize atheism the same way it scrutinizes Christianity,
and that journalists frequently introduced atheistic critiques into stories
about Christianity but never into stories about other religious faiths. Concern
for the feelings of atheists drove many stories, even questions asked of two
overtly religious Republican presidential candidates. In other words,
deliberately or not, several major news organizations promoted atheism and
atheists throughout 2007.
Back to Top
Atheism Ascendant?
Each
of the television networks touted the bestselling books on atheism to proclaim
that atheists were increasingly vocal and that atheism was on the rise. Only
National Public Radio (NPR) provided context to the
atheist-books-are-best-sellers storyline. NPR’s Morning Edition, on
January 22, ran a story about big retailers like Wal-Mart seeing an increase in
the sale of religious books. The reporter, Martha Woodroof, interviewed an
editor from Knopf Publishers who said that one of their representatives had
returned from a religious convention where Sam Harris’s book Letter to a
Christian Nation was the most talked-about title. Knopf published Harris’s
book, but the editor acknowledged that people of faith were buying the book and
that it was “the centerpiece of some very interesting debates.” In other words,
the fact that books on atheism were selling like hotcakes did not necessarily
mean there was a significant rise in the number of atheists in the country.
CMI’s 2006 National Cultural Values Survey showed that only 8 percent of
Americans say they don’t believe in God.
Book sales, not
demographics, drove the television coverage of atheism. While acknowledging that
atheism is still a minority belief system, the networks amplified the voices of
atheism’s trinity—authors Hitchens, Dawkins and Harris—by suggesting that the
sales of their books demonstrated that atheism was ascendant in the culture.
ABC’s Bill Weir and Liz Marlantes exemplified this during the September 30
broadcast of Good Morning America. Marlantes was reporting on an atheist
convention, and Weir led into the story by saying, “A large convention of
atheists is gathering – men, women and children who all proclaim that God does
not exist. Still, of course, the minority view in this country, but it is a
view that is becoming more and more vocal with more and more members every
day.” Marlantes chimed in, “Call it ‘atheism unleashed.’ Books denying the
existence of God are topping the best seller lists. Congress now has its first
self-proclaimed atheists. There are even atheist summer camps for kids.” She
went on to speculate that the “stigma” of being an atheist “may be fading.”
The story aired on a
Sunday morning, and no opposing point of view was offered in the piece. After
Marlantes’ feature, Weir interviewed Christopher Hitchens in studio.
Such uncritical
promotion of atheism was typical in the coverage CMI examined.
Back
to Top
Newsweek and ABC Lead the Way
Newsweek
was the first media outlet out of the gate in covering atheism in 2007. The
January 8 issue profiled a Web site called Blasphemy Challenge. The piece ran
in the magazine’s Belief Watch column, a unique, near-weekly feature that
purports to address issues of faith and belief across the spectrum. The
Blasphemy Challenge column reported on an atheist group called the Rational
Response Squad that set up a Web site daring people to commit what the Bible
terms the “unforgivable sin” of blaspheming the Holy Spirit. The story ranked
high on Newsweek’s Popularity Index, a measure of how many times a story
gets viewed at Newsweek.com.
ABC picked up the baton
and featured the group and Web site during the January 30 broadcast of
Nightline. On January 31, Nightline anchor Terry Moran commented
that the story had generated a “passionate debate” among viewers on the show’s
message board. So intriguing did ABC find the segment that during the May
ratings sweeps, it dedicated an entire Nightline program to a debate with
two members of the Rational Response Squad versus a pastor and Christian actor
Kirk Cameron.
Newsweek
and ABC both led their competitors in the amount of coverage they gave to
atheism and atheists. Stories about atheism, atheist commentaries, or mentions
of atheism were present in 51 percent (25) of the 2007 issues of Newsweek,
compared with 35 percent (17) of the issues of Time and just 2 percent (1
issue) of U.S. News and World Report. In total the three magazines ran 12
stories on atheism, included 22 mentions in reporting on other topics, and had
10 issues containing letters to the editor from atheists.
Newsweek
devoted more space than the other newsweeklies to atheism, due in large part to
the Belief Watch column, which featured or mentioned atheism five times. Just
in time for Easter, Newsweek’s April 9 cover headline asked “Is God
Real?” That issue contained a three-page essay by editor Jon Meacham detailing
the debate about God’s existence that led into a six-page debate between
evangelical pastor Rick Warren (author of the best selling The Purpose Driven
Life) and atheist Sam Harris.
Newsweek
added to its pro-atheism story count by profiling Christopher Hitchens in the
May 14 issue and then giving him two pages in the September 10 issue to critique
a book about Mother Teresa’s spiritual struggles.
On the television side,
ABC addressed atheism 25 times, compared to 16 for CBS and 11 for NBC. ABC
devoted the most time to atheism, thanks to ABC’s Nightline January 30
Blasphemy Challenge segment, which then led to a full program featuring a debate
about the existence of God that aired May 9.
Back
to Top
Counterpoints to Christianity Only
The news media in this
study used atheists to offer counterpoints to Christian-themed stories, but not
to stories dealing with other faiths. In 77 stories that dealt with Christian
issues or themes, atheism or atheists were mentioned 71 percent of the time.
Also, journalists were far less likely to include religious views in stories on
atheism. Out of 21 stories focused on atheism, a religious counterpoint was
offered in only 11, or 54 percent of the time.
Newsweek
provides several examples of this treatment.
§
The May 14
issue contained an excerpt from Pope Benedict XVI’s book Jesus of Nazareth.
In a story about the Pope’s efforts to write the book, reporter Lisa Miller
included this nod to atheists: “This approach is not
surprising,
given Benedict’s job description, but in a world where Christopher Hitchens, Sam
Harris and other proponents of secularism credit belief in Jesus as one of the
sources of the world’s ills….”
§
The September 10 issue featured a critique of the book Mother Teresa: Come Be
My Light. The reviewer was Christopher Hitchens, termed by Newsweek
“the nun’s leading critic.” Hitchens himself had written a book against Mother
Teresa entitled The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice.
Hitchens’s Newsweek piece was less about the book and more a two-page
opportunity for Hitchens to blast the nun one more time. He said the subtitle
of the book was “slightly sickly,” termed the handwritten notes contained in the
book “scrawled” and “desperate,” called Mother Teresa a “confused old lady” and
wrote that her letters and what he presumed to be her loss of faith was “the
inevitable result of a dogma that asks people to believe impossible things and
then makes them feel abject and guilty when their innate reason rebels.” (It
should be noted that Time also did a feature story on Mother Teresa’s
spiritual struggles. That story also quoted Hitchens, but limited his comments
to three sentences and described his book about her as a “polemic.”)
§
By contrast, the Newsweek review of Hitchens’ book, God is Not Great,
in the May 21 issue contained no Christian counterpoint, other than to admire
Hitchens for having the nerve to quote from the Bible. Reporter Jerry Adler
wrote as if he was enamored of Hitchens, ending his piece with this: “…he has
been known to give the middle finger to audiences who disagree with him. They
get off lightly, compared to God.”
Is it possible to report
on a religious-themed story and not include an atheist viewpoint? The
answer is yes, proved by U.S. News and World Report. In 2007 the
magazine carried two cover stories dealing with religion. The November 26 issue
contained a 32-page spread on “Sacred Places,” and the December 24 issue
featured “A Return to Ritual,” which examined the growing trend of embracing
tradition in many religions. Neither piece included an atheist viewpoint.
Television reports also
frequently favored atheists when reporting on Christian-themed stories. In
November, ABC, CBS and NBC all reported on the governor of drought-stricken
Georgia’s decision to hold a public prayer session asking God for rain.
Governor Sonny Perdue held the prayer session outside the capitol building,
drawing protests from those who think praying on government property is
inappropriate if not illegal. In covering the story, ABC and CBS both included
interviews with an atheist who raised the separation of church and state issue.
In his November 13 ABC Good Morning America story about Perdue’s prayer
session, reporter Steve Osunsami gave an atheist six times as much air time as
Governor Perdue. The governor got a three-second sound bite while the atheist
had two sound bites and b-roll footage of him walking in town, for a total of 20
seconds. CBS’s story was more evenly weighted. NBC’s reporting of the story
occurred on the Today show as an anchor-read by Ann Curry followed by a
brief conversation between anchors Matt Lauer, Meredith Vieira and weatherman Al
Roker. It contained no atheist viewpoint.
ABC was the only network
to follow up with a brief anchor mention that it rained a few hours after Gov.
Perdue’s prayer service concluded.
Back to Top
Atheism: A Question for
Republicans Only
Atheism also became part
of the political dialogue in the 2007 presidential race. But only Republican
candidates who spoke openly about their faith were asked directly how they felt
about atheists. Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney were asked specifically whether
they would appoint atheists to government positions if they were elected. No
reporters asked Democratic candidates this question, even though Hillary
Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards all described themselves openly as
Christians, and the media had reported about the Democrats’ plans to engage
churchgoers.
NBC’s Meet the Press
bookended the year with questions for Mike Huckabee about atheism. Both times
host Tim Russert used a 1998 Huckabee speech to the Southern Baptist Convention
to lead into the question. The first interview happened January 28. Russert
started with: “I want to ask you a couple of things that you said earlier in
your political career. … [Huckabee] ‘I hope we answer the alarm clock and take
this nation back for Christ.’ Would you as president consider America a
Christian nation and try to lead it as – into a situation as being a more
Christian nation?
Huckabee responded that
he would “make no apology” for his faith but that it was dangerous to “say that
we are a nation that ought to be pushed into a Christian faith by its leaders.”
Russert would not let up. “But when you say ‘take this nation back for Christ,’
what does that say to Jews, Muslims, agnostics, atheists?”
Russert came back
to the subject 11 months and two days later, interviewing Huckabee on the
December 30 broadcast of Meet the Press.
Russert:
And then, and then this comment. “I hope we answer the alarm clock and take
this nation back for Christ.” Where does….
Huckabee:
Which was, by the way, that phrase was one I think was 1998, is that when
it was? The 1998 speech?
Russert:
Yeah.
Huckabee:
To the Southern Baptist Convention. So it was a speech made to a Christian
gathering, and, and, certainly that would be appropriate to be said to a
gathering of Southern Baptists.
Russert:
But where does this leave non-Christians?
Huckabee:
Oh, it leaves them right in the middle of America. I think the
Judeo-Christian background of this country is one that respects people not
only of faith, but it respects people who don’t have faith….
Russert:
So you’d have no problem appointing atheists to your Cabinet
Huckabee:
No, I wouldn’t have any problem at all appointing atheists.
Mitt Romney’s speech on
his Mormon faith, and his statement that “freedom requires religion,” provided
another opportunity for journalists to raise concerns about atheists. Again,
Meet the Press took up the cause on December 16, when Russert asked Romney,
“So if you determined that the most qualified person for the Supreme Court or
for attorney general or secretary of education happened to be an atheist or
agnostic, that wouldn’t prevent you from appointing them?” Romney replied, “Of
course not.”
In a December 17 story
titled “A New American Holy War,” Newsweek editor Jon Meacham wrote about
Romney’s speech, “Romney’s failure to make a noble public stand for the rights
of atheists and skeptics is tactically understandable if
intellectually
disappointing.” He went on to write, “…religious believers, who far outnumber
those who do not believe, have a special obligation to be humble and gracious
and respectful.”
ABC’s George Will, the
resident conservative on This Week, fretted about the implied message in
Romney’s comments about religion and freedom on the December 9 broadcast. He
said, “Ergo atheists are problematic citizens. Agnostics are problematic
citizens. And that’s – we’re reaching, I swear, a critical mass in this country
where you’re going to get a rebellion of people against this suffusion of public
life with…” Sam Donaldson cut him off at that point.
The July 23 issue of
Time featured a poll titled “How Voters Mix Religion and Politics.”
Atheists were featured on two of the questions: 1) whether religious values
should “serve as a guide” to what leaders do in office; and 2) their approval
of Rudy Giuliani, then the leading Republican candidate for president.
Back to Top
Exquisite Sensitivity Shown to
Atheists
Unlike the skeptical
treatment usually given to Christians, the media showed an exquisite sensitivity
to atheists and their beliefs. Seventeen out of 21 feature stories about
atheism or atheists had a positive tone, and the rest were neutral. No feature
stories were negative. This was most obvious in reporting on The Golden
Compass, the movie based on the first book of a bestselling trilogy by
atheist author Philip Pullman, which was expected to be a blockbuster when it
was released in December.
The agenda of the
series, to destroy religious faith, was first brought to light by the Catholic
League in the autumn. But most reports on the movie either ignored the concerns
of Christians or treated them as a nuisance.
§
Time (12/10):
no mention of any controversy or concern in a feature about Philip Pullman,
the book and the movie.
§
ABC (11/12): no
mention of any controversy or concern in an interview with Golden Compass
actress Nicole Kidman on Good Morning America.
§
Newsweek
(12/3): In a three-page feature on the movie, reporter Devin Gordon wrote,
“The film stands accused of being both anti-Catholic and not anti-Catholic
enough – though no one making either claim has actually seen it. The loud,
bristling organization known as the Catholic League is urging families to
boycott a film in which the word “Catholic” is never uttered.
§
NBC (11/2): The book The
Golden Compass was featured on Today as a feature for “Al’s Book
Club.” Al Roker asked Pullman about the Catholic League’s concerns, saying,
“It’s a real best seller and it’s got a lot going with it when it generates
a little controversy. The Catholic League called – released a statement –
saying it’s atheism for kids. What’s your response to ‘this book, is, say
anti-Christian?’” Pullman responded that he didn’t trust people “who tell
us how we should understand something” and preferred to “trust the reader”
and the “democracy of reading.” He maintained the book champions the value
of “open-minded intellectual curiosity.
None of the journalists
reporting these stories showed professional due diligence. Philip Pullman is on
the record saying his books are “about killing God” (Sydney [Australia]
Morning Herald, 12/13/2003). He has also produced a DVD for children
titled “Why Atheism” as part of an attempt to get atheism taught in schools,
according to a July 10, 2007 article in The Independent.
To
their credit, both CBS and NPR’s Morning Edition reported more
extensively on the controversial elements of Pullman’s work and the concerns of
Christians about The Golden Compass. On November 28, CBS’s Early Show
featured a debate between Bill Donohue of the Catholic League and Ellen Johnson
of American Atheists.
Atheists received
uncritical treatment from the media in myriad stories. On May 11, ABC’s
20/20 was devoted to “The Power of Faith.” Story topics were varied and
included features on exorcism, faith healers, cloistered nuns, and why people
need faith. In the middle of the show atheism was portrayed sympathetically in
a feature about a student who was suspended from her Oklahoma high school. She
said it was because she identified herself as an atheist and refused to pray
before a basketball game. The predominantly Christian town she lived in, the
local pastor and school officials were portrayed as judgmental.
John Stossel:
Students called her names, she says.
Nicole Smalkowski:
You know, they would call me devil worshiper. I’d walk down the halls,
people would laugh at me. They would look at me really weird and stare me
down.
John Stossel:
Then she says teachers joined in. What would they say?
Nicole Smalkowski:
This is a Christian country. If you don’t like it, get out.
In the segment Stossel
also interviewed Richard Dawkins, who said, “The time has come for people of
reason to say enough is enough. Religious faith discourages independent thought.
It’s divisive and it’s dangerous.” Stossel mentioned that Dawkins was touring
the country to promote his book and speculated that he might be getting angry
reactions because “America is a very religious country.” Dawkins replied, “I
thought just the same, but people thanked me over and over again for saying what
they themselves would like to say, but somehow feel they better not.” Stossel
did not challenge that assertion.
Other promotional
material for atheism came in the July 6 issue of Newsweek, which
spotlighted a parenting book for atheists. Time served up a fluff piece
on
an atheist Sunday school in San Francisco in the December 3 issue. Neither of
these stories included religious counterpoints.
The media used Christmas
as another ripe opportunity to showcase the sensitivities of atheists. NBC’s
Nightly News included atheists in a story on the
now-standard
“Happy Holidays” vs. “Merry Christmas” controversy on December 20. NPR’s
December 23 Weekend Edition ran a story on how hard the holiday season is
for atheists. NPR reporter Tovia Smith said, “Every year, as the holidays
approach, the issues for atheists begin to bubble up.” She continued, “Amanda
Shapiro, president of the Harvard Humanist Society, leads about a dozen fellow
students into a virtual minefield where even sugar cookies and ‘Jingle Bells’
ignite controversy.”
Back
to Top
Conclusion and Recommendation
The news media report on
atheism as a “religion,” but the news media did not subject atheism or atheists
to the same skepticism to which they subject Christians and Christianity. By
airing unchallenged interviews and predominantly reporting positive-toned
features, the news media effectively promoted atheism. While the media are not
obligated to treat all religions and belief systems equally, their failure to
subject atheism to the levels of skeptical scrutiny directed at Christianity and
other religions suggests a deplorable double standard.
Using
atheism as a foil against Christianity, but not against any other religion,
suggests an anti-Christian bias. If journalists call on atheists to comment on
one religion, they should use atheists to comment on others. Further, if
reporters use prominent atheists to offer opposing views on religion-themed
stories, they should – in equal measure – invite leading believers to provide
perspective on stories about atheism. Journalists who look at America’s
majority religion through a skeptical prism should also apply their critical
faculties to atheism.
Executive Summary |
PDF Version
Back to Top
|